Seems like if they changed the criteria of downtime. If you hover over the individual days you’ll see lot of degraded messages, but still green.
8 hours ago [-]
craigmart 14 hours ago [-]
I had checked that page not long ago, and as far as I remember there were many "red" or "orange" days in the past 3 months. Now it's all green. That's concerning
tosti 9 hours ago [-]
If they've actually improved the service, it would be fine. Is there reasonable plausability, reasonable doubt, or reasonable suspicion?
coolgoose 13 hours ago [-]
They have an incident reported today, but the status page for actions shows green :D that's fun.
hsbauauvhabzb 13 hours ago [-]
I clicked through wayback machine and couldn’t see any strong indicators that uptime had been rewritten, but there are a lot of snapshots. If you can prove it, I’m interested.
darkwater 8 hours ago [-]
As said, maybe I'm really hallucinating and mixed up the official and unofficial GH status pages, but there are definitely incidents published in the official one that are not counted as downtime or even partial degradation in the uptime counter.
bob1029 14 hours ago [-]
This has gotten to a point where it doesn't really matter anymore. When a service crosses a certain reliability threshold it's like a phase change. The customer base eventually adapts to the situation. Anyone who still genuinely cares has moved to self hosted enterprise or something else by now. It was most tenuous for me when they almost met the SLA. Now that they've blown so far beyond it, the stress is mostly gone.
JsonDemWitOster 14 hours ago [-]
I care but I can't move out because it's Orders from Up High which migrated us to Github. We haven't been here a year and it's not worth my neck to mirror our code in some kind of skunkworks forge instance. Woe. Woe is me.
exhilaration 13 hours ago [-]
Our Big Giant Enterprise wants to move all our repos from ADO to GitHub for all the nifty AI features, but I'm told the frequent downtime is a major issue so we're slow-walking the migration.
kelseydh 13 hours ago [-]
We have so many automated workflows and pipelines moving through Github Actions + other Github integrations it would be a giant headache to migrate. Not clear where we would go either. Gitlab??
Zealotux 14 hours ago [-]
Soon we'll have to track when Github is up.
bernds74 13 hours ago [-]
The London Underground have been doing it in reverse for a long time. "There is good service on the Piccadilly line."
Xymist 11 minutes ago [-]
The phrasing they chose is particularly amusing, since it's always false regardless of the day. They could have said "usual service", and left in the plausible acknowledgement of the fact that it's hot, cramped, miserable, grubby, loud, plague-ridden, mouse-ridden, and generally unpleasant.
DamonHD 14 hours ago [-]
First time that GitHub has ever been down for me (London, UK):
504 Gateway Time-out
The server didn't respond in time.
bonesss 14 hours ago [-]
I just got the same in Western EU, refreshed and got a site, and now it's gone again with intermittent hiccups of life.
Honestly it's pretty mad to see, especially without a crisp failover.
DamonHD 14 hours ago [-]
And it came back for me, at least for a refresh or two...
JsonDemWitOster 14 hours ago [-]
The Google SRE book offers the following as one of the reasons to not gun for 100% reliability (emphasis added):
> users typically don’t notice the difference between high reliability and extreme reliability in a service, because the user experience is dominated by less reliable components like the cellular network or the device they are working with. Put simply, a user on a 99% reliable smartphone cannot tell the difference between 99.99% and 99.999% service reliability!
I've been on a shaky relationship with my ISP of late. What brought me to this thread today is that I couldn't push to Github. Notably this isn't covered by their downtime report so, going by the available facts, it's _probably_ not Github's fault I couldn't push; and I've just been on my daily stand-up call and I got disconnected so frequently.
But looking beyond today's available facts, odds are there's a bigger problem GH is not mentioning in their status page. They say the current incident has to do with "unauthorized users" and I wonder if pushing a commit from my IDE client counts as an operation from an "unauthorized user" as I still have to authorize with my SSH key.
It's just insane I can't decide which between Github or German o2 should be the more reliable service!
ownagefool 13 hours ago [-]
Github isn't having a debate over how many 9s they have, they're having a zero 9s problem.
I think there's 3 big themes with this, thought not
1. LLM tools have added considerable load.
2. LLM used by developers to increase velocity seem to be leading more outages. This calls into question the increased velocity.
3. Roadmaps focused on pushing features that aren't reliability problems. i.e. github moving to azure, or adding AI features.
All these same problems happen to orgs with other fads that aren't AI. Following fads is not good engineering.
Grombobulous 56 minutes ago [-]
Your comment made me think: if GitHub was a Google product with similar popularity and scaling trajectory, would we see similar reliability issues?
Absolutely not. Google has reliability practices so deeply ingrained in their company they’re like an involuntary reflex.
This is a management issue.
spondyl 13 hours ago [-]
"unauthorized" is a bit different than "unauthenticated". The former suggests trying to access something you don't have permission for while the latter suggests you're just not logged in.
At a guess, I could imagine some sort of failure of cached pages, which can be cached for signed out users but probably not for signed in users (as the rendered HTML would need to have user context like their avatar etc)
kelseydh 13 hours ago [-]
Apparently Github is experiencing a huge increase in usage due to LLMs and this is the cause for a lot of their instability as of late.
IshKebab 13 hours ago [-]
> Put simply, a user on a 99% reliable smartphone cannot tell the difference between 99.99% and 99.999% service reliability!
Sure they can. If Google loads and Github doesn't, then it's clearly Github being down, not the mobile network.
Also not everyone uses a phone. My desktop & fibre internet has way better than 99% reliability.
cyberjunkie 14 hours ago [-]
Waiting for someone to say this was always the case, not just post Microsoft's takeover.
exploraz 14 hours ago [-]
> Following investigation, we are seeing that impact is limited to unauthenticated users when accessing Pull Requests or Issues. Our team continues to work towards mitigation with more updates to follow as we have them.
deviation 13 hours ago [-]
We should have a pinned post, just for GitHub outages.
Rohunyyy 14 hours ago [-]
GitHub is down for like the nth time this week? Time for some truly ground breaking statements like this is the result of LLM (yes it is I know)
JsonDemWitOster 14 hours ago [-]
Well thankfully it's Monday so they've only been down for the _first_ time this week!
Keyframe 14 hours ago [-]
What's going on with GitHub lately? I've never seen them having so much issues over the years as they do have now.
orwin 14 hours ago [-]
Microsoft management/engineering practices+AI slop.
Keyframe 13 hours ago [-]
I get that, but all of that was in there for quite some time though, no?
netdevphoenix 13 hours ago [-]
Digital systems don't necessarily deteriorate immediately after the causal factors. Like technical debt, issues grow unnoticed and become visible gradually.
phplovesong 13 hours ago [-]
That, but also AI tools have made github req/res go up by 100x. There is simply too muvh AI generated traffic.
I k ow for a fact that ANY other platform would fail faster than github if they had the same volume of http requests.
witx 14 hours ago [-]
Slophub is vibing strong
ramon156 14 hours ago [-]
Welcome back everyone
sscaryterry 13 hours ago [-]
Now self-hosting, left the dumpster fire.
yanhangyhy 14 hours ago [-]
shit i thought it was because my browser. sorry firefox..
why i am keep seeing github down news in HN?
exploraz 14 hours ago [-]
Simply because of being a dependency of many things.
Because majority of the audience spend large parts of their day on GitHub and it keeps going down.
phplovesong 13 hours ago [-]
People seem to miss entirely that this is not (only) some slop code that makes github go down, but its the fact that they get 100x the number of requests since AI tools came to the devs daily workflow.
rvz 14 hours ago [-]
Once again, GitHub is down. Last time an incident happened was 2 days ago [0].
Could not have happened on a worse day (Monday) and you can see how unreliable GitHub has been.
In my employment from the last 3 years, I saw twice that there were two migrations from internal systems to GitHub. I would think that companies are doing this for cost-cutting measures. It's not like something I am going to research but it'd be interesting that their recent issues are related to large migrations from in-house installations to github and doubly, if that is related to how large companies might be tightening up their spending in the past few years.
m-schuetz 14 hours ago [-]
Anything I'd self-host would be down way more often than github.
ta8903 13 hours ago [-]
Only for a scale approaching github's, otherwise a gitea instance or whatever doesn't have any interdependent components other than the server you host it on, which won't have nearly as low a downtime as github (though that's a low bar, a better way to phrase it would be saying it would pretty much never be down).
lmm 14 hours ago [-]
Monday is probably the best day for an outage? Everyone's in the office, so you're not disturbing them, and hung over, so you're not hurting their productivity much.
forlorn 14 hours ago [-]
Ah, here we go again. A weekly (daily?) github is down thread
API Requests with 4 nines of availability??
Issues with 99.96 uptime?
PR with 99.61% uptime last 90 days??
https://mrshu.github.io/github-statuses/ marks PRs at 95.89% in the same period as an example.
Honestly it's pretty mad to see, especially without a crisp failover.
> users typically don’t notice the difference between high reliability and extreme reliability in a service, because the user experience is dominated by less reliable components like the cellular network or the device they are working with. Put simply, a user on a 99% reliable smartphone cannot tell the difference between 99.99% and 99.999% service reliability!
I've been on a shaky relationship with my ISP of late. What brought me to this thread today is that I couldn't push to Github. Notably this isn't covered by their downtime report so, going by the available facts, it's _probably_ not Github's fault I couldn't push; and I've just been on my daily stand-up call and I got disconnected so frequently.
But looking beyond today's available facts, odds are there's a bigger problem GH is not mentioning in their status page. They say the current incident has to do with "unauthorized users" and I wonder if pushing a commit from my IDE client counts as an operation from an "unauthorized user" as I still have to authorize with my SSH key.
It's just insane I can't decide which between Github or German o2 should be the more reliable service!
I think there's 3 big themes with this, thought not
1. LLM tools have added considerable load.
2. LLM used by developers to increase velocity seem to be leading more outages. This calls into question the increased velocity.
3. Roadmaps focused on pushing features that aren't reliability problems. i.e. github moving to azure, or adding AI features.
All these same problems happen to orgs with other fads that aren't AI. Following fads is not good engineering.
Absolutely not. Google has reliability practices so deeply ingrained in their company they’re like an involuntary reflex.
This is a management issue.
At a guess, I could imagine some sort of failure of cached pages, which can be cached for signed out users but probably not for signed in users (as the rendered HTML would need to have user context like their avatar etc)
Sure they can. If Google loads and Github doesn't, then it's clearly Github being down, not the mobile network.
Also not everyone uses a phone. My desktop & fibre internet has way better than 99% reliability.
I k ow for a fact that ANY other platform would fail faster than github if they had the same volume of http requests.
why i am keep seeing github down news in HN?
https://www.githubstatus.com/history
https://isgithubcooked.com/
Could not have happened on a worse day (Monday) and you can see how unreliable GitHub has been.
Better of self-hosting.
[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48418183